Agile XR ES Edition
  • Bienvenida e introducción
  • Aprendizajes clave del proyecto y reflexiones
  • Resultado 1 del proyecto
    • 1 - Guía: Trabajo en Equipo Ágil en el Aprendizaje Basado en la Web
      • Capítulo 1 - Agile en Software
        • 1.1 Valores en el desarrollo de software Agile
        • 1.2 Principios en el desarrollo de software Agile
        • 1.3 Gestión de proyectos y prácticas Agile
        • 1.4 Mentalidad Agile
      • Capítulo 2 - Agile en Educación
        • 2.1 Brújula Agile para la Educación
        • 2.2 eduScrum
        • 2.3 Escuelas Ágora
        • 2.4 Centros de Aprendizaje Ágil
      • Capítulo 3 - Prácticas Agile para el Aprendizaje Basado en Proyectos
        • 3.1 Planificación y Ejecución de Sprints
        • 3.2 Reuniones Diarias
        • 3.3 Aprendizaje Colaborativo y Proyectos
          • 3.3.1 Iniciación del proyecto
          • 3.3.2 Planificación del proyecto
          • 3.3.3 Ejecución del proyecto
          • 3.3.4 Rendimiento/monitoreo del proyecto
          • 3.3.5 Cierre del proyecto
          • 3.3.6 Rituales Ágiles utilizando Mural
      • Conclusiones
      • Bonus: Entrevistas con expertos en Agile
        • Entrevista con Yeremi Marín, facilitador de ALC en EduCambiando, México
        • Entrevista con Ryan Shollenberger, Co-director ALC NYC
        • Entrevista con Willy Wijnands, Cofundador eduScrum
    • 2 - Tutoriales en Vídeo: Técnicas de Enseñanza Agile
  • Resultado del Proyecto 2
    • 3 - Guía: Implementación de RV/RE en Educación Basada en Equipos
      • Nuestro Enfoque: Investigación-Diseño
      • Estado de la RV para la Educación
      • Cómo Elegir Hardware y Software de RV
      • Pruebas y Benchmarking de Plataformas VR
      • Diseñando Ambientes Virtuales para el Aprendizaje en RV
    • 4 - Manual: Spatial.io para Trabajo en Equipo Potenciado por RV
      • Terminología en XR
  • Resultado del Proyecto 3
    • 5 - Taller: Diseñando Cursos de Aprendizaje Mixto
      • Sesión 1 - Replanteamiento del Proyecto de Diseño
      • Sesión 2 - Entendiendo la Experiencia del Estudiante
      • Sesión 3 - Entendiendo la Experiencia del Profesor
      • Sesión 4 - Plan de Curso Mixto
    • 6 - Taller: Mejorando Lecciones Existentes para el Aprendizaje Mixto
      • Sesión 1 - Escaneo Rápido
      • Sesión 2 - Escaneo Profundo
    • 7 - Plantillas de Planes de Lección para Aprendizaje en Línea e Híbrido
      • LP1 - Introducción a la IA - Escuela Primaria
      • LP2 - Habilidades de Planificación - Nivel Educación Secundaria
      • LP3 - Introducción a la Radioactividad - Nivel de Bachillerato
      • LP4 - Muro de Berlín - Nivel de Bachillerato
      • LP 5-10 - Proyecto Lifelab - Nivel de Bachillerato
  • Resultado del Proyecto 4
    • 8 - Guía: Dominar el Aprendizaje a Distancia Eficaz
      • Módulo 1: Introducción
        • ¿Qué es el aprendizaje a distancia y por qué se está expandiendo tan rápido?
        • Aprendizaje en línea
      • Módulo 2: Métodos de implementación del aprendizaje a distancia
        • Aprendizaje sincrónico en línea
        • Aprendizaje asíncrono en línea
        • Aprendizaje combinado y aprendizaje invertido/aula invertida
      • Módulo 3: Gestión del aula en el aprendizaje en línea
        • Gestión de clases en el aprendizaje a distancia y cómo involucrar a los estudiantes en el aprendizaje a distancia
      • Módulo 4: Fomentar el aprendizaje colaborativo en el aprendizaje a distancia
        • Aprendizaje colaborativo en el aprendizaje a distancia
        • Aprendizaje basado en problemas y aprendizaje basado en proyectos en el aprendizaje a distancia
        • Aprendizaje cooperativo en el aprendizaje a distancia
      • Módulo 5: Cómo fomentar las interacciones sociales en el aprendizaje a distancia
      • Módulo 6: Herramientas tecnológicas educativas para el aprendizaje a distancia
      • Referencias
    • 9 - Guía de Referencia: Herramientas EdTech para la Enseñanza Interactiva
      • Módulo 1: Introducción
        • ¿Cómo lograr un mayor compromiso de los estudiantes?
        • ¿Qué se puede hacer con menos o ningún apoyo del profesor? (p. ej., para clases invertidas)
      • Módulo 2: EdPuzzle
      • Módulo 3: Socrative
      • Módulo 4: Trello
      • Módulo 5: Nearpod
      • Módulo 6: Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, etc. (Herramientas de documentos compartidos)
    • 10 - Herramienta Digital: Ayudante de decisión sobre EdTech
    • 11 - Informe: Evaluación de Pilotos de Enseñanza Ágil y VR/XR
      • Introducción
        • El proyecto "Trabajo en equipo Ágil Aumentado para el aprendizaje híbrido en Escuelas" (AgileXR)
        • Resultado del Proyecto 4: Piloto y Evaluación del Impacto y Lecciones Aprendidas
        • Marco Teórico Breve
        • Experiencias de Enseñanza Piloto en el Proyecto AgileXR
      • Objetivo del informe
      • Método
        • Participantes
        • Materiales
        • Análisis de Datos
        • Procedimiento
      • Resultados y discusión
        • Perspectivas de los estudiantes
        • Perspectivas de los profesores
      • Implicaciones educativas
      • Conclusiones
      • Referencias bibliográficas
      • Apéndice
        • Apéndice 1. Cuestionario de evaluación del piloto para estudiantes
    • Apéndice 3. GDPR - Autorización familiar para estudiantes de secundaria
  • Traducciones
    • 12 - Traducciones de Publicaciones Multilingües
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Resultado del Proyecto 4
  2. 11 - Informe: Evaluación de Pilotos de Enseñanza Ágil y VR/XR

Referencias bibliográficas

PreviousConclusionesNextApéndice

Last updated 1 year ago

Agatep, J. L. E., & Villalobos, R. N. (2020). Project-Based Learning Approach in Teaching Information and Communications Technology. Science Insights, 35(2), 216-221.

Al-Sholi, H. Y., Shadid, O. R., Alshare, K. A., & Lane, M. (2021). An agile educational framework: A response for the Covid-19 pandemic. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1980939.

Alnagrat, A., Ismail, R. C., Idrus, S. Z. S., & Alfaqi, R. M. A. (2022). A review of extended reality (XR) technologies in the future of human education: Current trend and future opportunity. Journal of Human Centered Technology, 1(2), 81-96.

Alsalem, M. A. (2016). Redefining literacy: The realities of digital literacy for students with disabilities in K-12. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(32), 205-215.

Athanasou, J. A., & Cooksey, R. W. (2001). Judgment of factors influencing interest: An Australian study. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 26(1), 77-98.

Azionya, C. M., & Nhedzi, A. (2021). The digital divide and higher education challenge with emergency online learning: Analysis of tweets in the wake of the COVID-19 lockdown. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(4), 164-182.

Barteit, S., Lanfermann, L., Bärnighausen, T., Neuhann, F., & Beiersmann, C. (2021). Augmented, mixed, and virtual reality-based head-mounted devices for medical education: systematic review. JMIR serious games, 9(3), e29080.

Bates, A. T., & Sangra, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning. John Wiley & Sons.

Beck, K., Beedle, M., Van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., ... & Kern, J. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development. Agile Alliance.

Bergdahl, N., Knutsson, O., & Fors, U. (2018, July). ‘So, you think it’s good’ - reasons students engage when learning with technologies – a student perspective. In Proceedings of EDULEARN18 Conference (pp. 9230-9237).

Bidjerano, T. (2005, October). Gender differences in self-regulated learning. In 36th Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association.

Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1), 1-14.

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 2.

Buchmann, C., DiPrete, T. A., & McDaniel, A. (2008). Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 319-337.

Burov, O., & Pinchuk, O. (2021). Extended reality in digital learning: influence, opportunities and risks’ mitigation. Educational Dimension, 5, 144-160.

Çakmak, V., & Aktan, E. (2016). Review of the communication between teachers and students according to various variants. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 15(56), 83-97.

Callingham, M. (2019). Student Engagement and Democratic Justice in Education: For One and for All? [Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University]. Victoria University Institutional Repository.

Chiang, T. H., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365.

Dawson, P. (2020). Defending assessment security in a digital world: preventing e-cheating and supporting academic integrity in higher education. Routledge.

Desai, S. R. (2022). Impact of active learning methods on students' learning and course results. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35(3), 133-142.

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. (pp. 1–19). Elsevier.

Ferdig, R. E., Baumgartner, E., Hartshorne, R., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., & Mouza, C. (Eds.). (2020). Teaching, technology, and teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stories from the field. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem based learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. Computers & Education, 142, 103635.

Han, B., & Tosten, R. (2016). In-class teacher-student communication according to high school students’ perceptions. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, Nicosia, 11, 190-198.

Halawah, I. (2011). Factors influencing college students' motivation to learn from students' perspective. Education, 132(2), 379-390.

Hwang, G. J., & Chen, C. H. (2017). Influences of an inquiry-based ubiquitous gaming design on students’ learning achievements, motivation, behavioral patterns, and tendency towards critical thinking and problem solving. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 950–971.

Kahu, E. R., Nelson, K. J., & Picton, C. (2017). Student interest as a key driver of engagement for first year students. Student Success, 8(2), 55-66.

Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning online: What research tells us about whether, when and how. Routledge.

Rutkiene, A., & Greenspon, R. (2018, May). Contribution of technology enhanced learning to the inclusion of students with special education needs. In SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (Vol. 5, pp. 436-444).

Twigg, C. A. (2003). Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning. Educause Review, 38(5), 28-38.

Cárdenas-Sainz, B. A., Barrón-Estrada, M. L., Zatarain-Cabada, R., & Chavez-Echeagaray, M. E. (2023). Evaluation of eXtended reality (XR) technology on motivation for learning physics among students in mexican schools. Computers & Education: X Reality, 3, 100036.

Chatterjee, R., & Correia, A. P. (2020). Online students’ attitudes toward collaborative learning and sense of community. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(1), 53-68.

Chen, C., Landa, S., Padilla, A., & Yur-Austin, J. (2021). Learners' experience and needs in online environments: adopting agility in teaching. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 14(1), 18-31.

Ciani, K. D., Ferguson, Y. L., Bergin, D. A., & Hilpert, J. C. (2010). Motivational influences on school‐prompted interest. Educational Psychology, 30(3), 425-442.

Conboy, K. (2009). Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development. Information Systems Research, 20(3), 329-354.

Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3‐D virtual environments?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10-32.

DeVito, M. (2016). Factors influencing student engagement. [Unpublished Certificate of Advanced Study Thesis, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT].

Di Natale, A. F., Repetto, C., Riva, G., & Villani, D. (2020). Immersive virtual reality in K‐12 and higher education: A 10‐year systematic review of empirical research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2006-2033.

Dörnenburg, E. (2018). The path to devops. IEEE software, 35(5), 71-75.

Ebede, S. S. (2018). Student engagement in higher education: Measuring the differences in community engagement [Master's thesis, University of Northern Iowa]. UNI ScholarWorks.

Freund, A. M. (2011). Introduction to the special section: The role of gender in school-related transitions and beyond. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 193_._

Garzón, J., Baldiris, S., Gutiérrez, J., & Pavón, J. (2020). How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100334.

Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447-459.

Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333-2351.

Guo, W., Lau, K. L., Wei, J., & Bai, B. (2021). Academic subject and gender differences in high school students’ self-regulated learning of language and mathematics. Current Psychology, 42, 7965–7980.

Hernández-Lara, A. B., Serradell-López, E., & Fitó-Bertran, À. (2019). Students’ perception of the impact of competences on learning: An analysis with business simulations. Computers in Human behavior, 101, 311-319.

Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning.

Krahe, C., Escamilla-Fajardo, P., & López-Carril, S. (2021). The influence of teacher-student communication on the importance of physical education. Facta Universitatis, Series: Physical Education and Sport, 19(1), 117-131.

Krčelić, P. (2017). Why (not) learn English: Gender differences in learners' motivation and demotivation. In EDULEARN17 Proceedings, 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies.

Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & Van Buuren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 49(2), 176-192.

Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50.

Liu, X., He, W., Zhao, L., & Hong, J. C. (2021). Gender differences in self-regulated online learning during the COVID-19 lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 752131.

Lowe, T., & El Hakim, Y. (2020). An introduction to student engagement in higher education. In T. Lowe, & Y. El Hakim (Eds.), A Handbook for Student Engagement in Higher Education (pp. 3-26). Routledge.

Luo, H., Li, G., Feng, Q., Yang, Y., & Zuo, M. (2021). Virtual reality in K‐12 and higher education: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2019. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 887-901.

Maican, C., Cazan, A.-M., Lixandroiu, R., Dovleac, L., & Maican, M. A. (2021). Exploring the factors influencing the use of communication and collaboration applications. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 33(4). 94-124.

Mayer, R. (2017). Using multimedia for e‐learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423.

Maran, P. L., Daniëls, R., & Slegers, K. (2022). The use of extended reality (XR) for people with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities (ID): A scoping review. Technology and Disability, 34(2), 53-67.

McKay, J., & Sridharan, B. (2023). Student perceptions of collaborative group work (CGW) in higher education. Studies in Higher Education.

Meccawy, M. (2022). Creating an immersive XR learning experience: A roadmap for educators. Electronics, 11(21), 3547.

Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 351-373.

Myers, K. D. (2019). Student participation in school sponsored extra-curricular activities at the elementary school level and the impact of student engagement [Doctoral dissertation, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine]. PCOM Psychology Dissertations.

Nguyen, H. C. (2019, July). Factors influencing student engagement in higher education context. In Proceedings of EDULEARN19 Conference (pp. 1329-1334).

Oliphant, T., & Branch-Mueller, J. (2016). Developing a sense of community and the online student experience. Education for Information, 32(4), 307-321.

Paz-Baruch, N., & Hazema, H. (2023). Self-regulated learning and motivation among gifted and high-achieving students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines: Examining differences between students from diverse socioeconomic levels. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 46(1), 34-76.

Pebriantika, L., Vidianti, A., & Wijaya, J. E. (2020). Factors affecting student interest in web-based learning in higher education. Advances in Pedagogical Sciences, 6(1), 57-60.

Pellas, N., Mystakidis, S., & Kazanidis, I. (2021). Immersive Virtual Reality in K-12 and Higher Education: A systematic review of the last decade scientific literature. Virtual Reality, 25(3), 835-861.

Peng, G. (2022). Analysis on the influencing factors of teacher-student relationship in postgraduate education. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 4(2), 100-102.

Permanyer, I., & Boertien, D. (2019). A century of change in global education variability and gender differences in education. PLOS ONE, 14(2), e0212692.

Priadi, R. (2020). Teacher communication effectiveness in the learning process. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(4), 3433-3444.

Qazi, A., Hasan, N., Abayomi-Alli, O., Hardaker, G., Scherer, R., Sarker, Y., ... & Maitama, J. Z. (2022). Gender differences in information and communication technology use & skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 4225-4258.

Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778.

Sá, M. J. (2023). Student Academic and Social Engagement in the Life of the Academy—A Lever for Retention and Persistence in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 13(3), 269.

Salza, P., Musmarra, P., & Ferrucci, F. (2019). Agile methodologies in education: A review. In D. Parsons & K. MacCallum (Eds.), Agile and lean concepts for teaching and learning: Bringing methodologies from industry to the classroom (pp. 25-45). Springer.

Schmalzried, J. E., & Harvey, M. W. (2014). Perceptions of special education and career and technical education collaboration and communication. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 37(2), 84–95.

Sharp, H., Robinson, H., & Petre, M. (2016). The role of physical artefacts in agile software development: Two complementary perspectives. Interacting with Computers, 28(6), 720-734.

Smith, L. D. (2015). Male gender disparity gap: does gender impact education. [Unpublished Certificate of Advanced Study Thesis, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT].

Spinath, B., Eckert, C., & Steinmayr, R. (2014). Gender differences in school success: What are the roles of students' intelligence, personality and motivation?. Educational Research, 56(2), 230-243.

Tanti, T., Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., & Fitriani, R. (2022). Student perception review from gender: Electronic moduls of Mathematical Physics. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 11(1), 125-132.

Turan, Z., Meral, E., & Sahin, I. F. (2018). The impact of mobile augmented reality in geography education: achievements, cognitive loads and views of university students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(3), 427–441.

Ucar, S., & Trundle, K. C. (2011). Conducting guided inquiry in science classes using authentic, archived, web-based data. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1571–1582.

van der Meer, N., van der Werf, V., Brinkman, W. P., & Specht, M. (2023). Virtual reality and collaborative learning: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 4, 1159905.

Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., & Marsicano, G. (2014). Academic motivation predicts educational attainment: Does gender make a difference? Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 124–131.

Vergara, K. C., Herskovic, V., & Guerrero, P. (2022). Understanding gender bias: Differences in tech stereotypes according to the socio-economic background of girls. In International Computing Education Research Workshop. ACM.

Virtanen, P., & Nevgi, A. (2010). Disciplinary and gender differences among higher education students in self‐regulated learning strategies. Educational Psychology, 30(3), 323-347.

Virtanen, S., Räikkönen, E., & Ikonen, P. (2015). Gender-based motivational differences in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25, 197-211.

White, E. H., Pavlovic, M., & Poed, S. (2020). Understanding and mapping digital literacy for students with disability. In P. Griffin, & K. Woods (Eds.), Understanding Students with Additional Needs as Learners. Springer.

Wilson, S. (2022). Student perception of learning versus performance in project management education. Journal of Management and Business Education, 5(1), 48-62.

Winn, S. (2002). Student Motivation: A socio-economic perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 445-457.

Zepke, N. (2015). Student Engagement Research: Thinking beyond the Mainstream. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1311-1323.

https://doi.org/10.15354/si.20.or030
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1980939
https://doi.org/10.11113/humentech.v1n2.27
https://doi.org/10.5328/JVER26.1.77
https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1002822
https://doi.org/10.2196/29080
https://agilemanifesto.org/
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7362735
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490777.pdf
https://doi.org/10.5334/JIME.528
https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-019-0176-8
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134719
https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.4723
https://vuir.vu.edu.au/39523/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100036
https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1703479
https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-11-2020-0073
https://doi.org/10.1080/01443411003660232
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0246
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
https://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=edl
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13030
https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.290110337
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/935/
https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411400805
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100334
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02120-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.023
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/104648
http://doi.org/10.22190/FUPES200916061E
https://doi.org/10.21125/EDULEARN.2017.1028
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752131
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429023033-2
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12538
https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.20210701.OA5
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-210363
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2227677
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11213547
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004
https://digitalcommons.pcom.edu/psychology_dissertations/494/
https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.0345
https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-160979
https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532221143825
https://doi.org/10.31580/APSS.V6I1.1246
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00450-8
https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v4i2.1525
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212692
https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i4.1378
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10775-x
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030269
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2751-3_2
https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143412467666
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2008.10.006
http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/edl/7
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2014.898917
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i1.35107
https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1455174
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.007
https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1159905
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2014.01.003
https://doi.org/10.1145/3501709.3544289
https://doi.org/10.1080/01443411003606391
https://doi.org/10.1007/S10798-014-9278-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56596-1_10
https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2022.0004
https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507022000011552
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1024635